Category 1: Worst EU Lobbying Category 2: Worst Conflict of Interest
<<< press your browser’s back button to go back to list of candidates

Caroline Jackson, Member of the European Parliament

Nominated for her twin roles as an elected representative dealing with environmental issues and as an appointed environmental advisor to a private waste management company, Shanks.

Jackson chaired the Committee on Environment, Consumer Protection and Public Health between 1999 and 2004, and is the UK Conservative Party Environment Spokesperson in Europe. Jackson is paid £6000 as a member of the Shanks environmental advisory board (EAB), a position she still holds.

In 2005/6 Jackson acted as rapporteur for the Waste Framework Directive (WFD), a policy area that clearly interests her private sector employers Shanks plc.

The chair of Shank’s Environmental Advisory Board praised Jackson’s “wide knowledge of European legislation” which it said has “been a benefit to our work”. In the company’s 2006/07 report, Shanks attested “The EC waste framework directive is […] being revised and as the MEP within the European Parliament responsible for the revision of the Directive, EAB member Caroline Jackson was able to keep us updated on progress during the year. This will have far-reaching implications for waste management and the EAB will consider its impacts on Shanks activities in the UK and mainland Europe.”

Michael Averill, Chief Executive of Shanks, was also the President of the European Federation of Waste Management and Environmental Services (FEAD) until February 2008, which represents the European waste management industry. FEAD ran a ‘consultancy group’ that looked at Jackson’s waste management report and lobbied Jackson three times. So Jackson, as the Rapporteur of a report on the waste framework directive, was lobbied by the industry group headed by the boss of a waste company where she is a consultant!

Despite this rather close relationship Jackson maintains that there is no conflict of interest as Shanks has no interest in incinerating waste. But Shanks website contradicts this, stating that it “remediates PCB and pesticide contaminated soil through high temperature incineration at dedicated facilities in the UK and the Netherlands.”

Vote for Jackson if you are opposed to elected representatives getting too close to private interests and compromising their ability to act in the public interest

Additional information :

Too Close for Comfort?, Andy Rowell, Spinwatch, July 2008.

About Shanks. Background, Shanks Website, last visited 15 October 2008.

Declaration of Member’s Financial Interests 2007, Caroline Jackson.

MEP on waste company payroll, Andrew Bounds, Financial Times, 13 June 2008.

Safety, Health and Environment Report 2006/2007, Shanks Group.

FEAD Bulletin N°15, June 21 – November 10 2006, European Federation of Waste Management and Environmental Services.

Services. Remediation, Shanks website, last visited 15 October 2008.



Comments

Name:
Comment:
For security reasons we use a CAPTCHA. Please type the words you see in the image:
  (all fields are required)

262 JBirkett 18 June 2009:
Glad to see this site exposing this type of conflict in interest. Also very helpful for my politics a level tomorrow. Many thanks

261 sneha 8 May 2009:
bakwaas . aata wata hain nahin bade aye photo lagane

249 David Perry 7 January 2009:
It is obscene that MEPs should be able to operate in this way. Sadly, it is what elected representatives of the UK Conservative party often do – at all levels of government. Please do not ever vote for this deceitful self-interested party!

229 Penny Jones 8 December 2008:
Blatant, and alas not unbelievable.

222 Sylvain Tardy 5 December 2008:
Hou la vilaine !

191 Regenboog 11 November 2008:
It has been proven that incineration kills. She is responsible for the people’s death.

183 Yorkie 8 November 2008:
It is exactly this kind of lobbying that undermines the reputation of the EU, the European Parliament, and any other European institution in Britain.

164 Ilse Kleinschuster 29 October 2008:
Ethische Prinzipien sind in der Welt der Mächtigen doch schon längst kein Thema mehr!

158 Jackie Walkden 28 October 2008:
No MEP should be employed by a firm they may have to regulate against.

156 Gavin ten Tusscher, M.D., Ph.D. 28 October 2008:
This reeks of a conflict of interests

129 Andrea Wolf 24 October 2008:
Solche Menschen sollten sofort zur Rechenschaft gezogen werden. Es gibt so wie so viel zu viele “Wasserköpfe” – das Geld für diese Leute, könnte auch sinnvoller eingesetzt werden.

77 Doci Müller 21 October 2008:
Ihr Gewissen ist rein – Sie hat es nie benutzt

54 Sandra Fornasier 21 October 2008:
Das stink ja zum Himmel !!!

24 Berthild Lorenz 21 October 2008:
Arbeitet sie vielleicht so gut,um an einen goldenen Sarg zu gelangen? Ob Tote in Goldsärgen besser liegen, davon hat noch kein auferstandener Mensch berichtet …

The Worst EU Lobbying Awards are organised by Corporate Europe Observatory, Friends of the Earth Europe, LobbyControl and Spinwatch.
This site is developed by easyMIND.