ExxonMobil
For continuing to fund climate change sceptics

Oil giant ExxonMobil has for years been the world’s most controversial oil firm for its opposition to the Kyoto Protocol and its role in convincing the US government to abstain from effective measures to combat climate change. Despite growing pressure, the company continues to fuel the work of climate sceptic think tanks and lobby groups in North America and Europe. Last year ExxonMobil distributed $2,9 million to 39 such groups. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank that aggressively challenges the need to act against global warming, was the biggest US beneficiary of ExxonMobil funding last year.

In Europe, ExxonMobil has funded virulent opponents of EU efforts to combat climate change such as the International Policy Network, the Centre for The New Europe, Tech Central Station and the International Council for Capital Formation – the latter three based in Brussels. In 2005, ExxonMobil funded the climate change programmes of Centre for The New Europe and the International Policy Network for $50,000 and $130,000 respectively. With these expenses ExxonMobil wants to create an environment where climate scepticism appears to come from respectable sources, whereas in reality the climate skeptics are paid by a vested interest to pollute the climate debate with non-scientific arguments.

Earlier this year, the Royal Society, the UK’s most prestigious scientific body, wrote to the oil giant to demand that it withdraws its funding for these groups because they have “misrepresented the science of climate change by outright denial of the evidence”. This demand was echoed in an open letter sent to ExxonMobil in October by two United States senators. The senators, one Republican and one Democrat, called upon the company to show corporate responsibility and “end any further financial assistance” to groups “whose public advocacy has contributed to the small but unfortunately effective climate change denial myth.”

Vote for ExxonMobil if you believe money shouldn’t buy science?

Links:

Letter to Nick Thomas, Director Corporate Affairs, Esso UK Ltd., The Royal Society, 4 September 2006

Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial, The Guardian, 20 September 2006

Pundits who contest climate change should tell us who is paying them, George Monbiot, The Guardian, 26 September 2006

Covert industry funding fuels the expansion of radical rightwing EU think tanks, Corporate Europe Observatory, July 2005

ExxonMobil’s Worldwide Giving Report 2005, Public Information and Policy, ExxonMobil Corporation, 2006




Comments
Name:

Comment: (max 1024 characters)



David Finney wrote on 02-11-2005:
The fulcrum of the Axis of Evil?

Free Software wrote on 01-11-2005:
In case of a large climate shift, the planet will go along just fine. It happened in the past. But humans depend on THIS delicate balance we live in. A global climate change will make Katrina look like a walk in the park. Our coastal cities, our ports, our residencial and industrial buildings will be severely damaged. The global economy will collapse, large scale industry and commerce will desappear. Religious fundamentalists will take over the world and plunge it into the dark ages, again. In this brave new world, there won’t be a place for Exxon-Mobil.

June wrote on 01-11-2005:
Some scientists appear to have no conscience…

Charlotte wrote on 01-11-2005:
Exxon supports lots of doubtful pipeline-projects all over the world. E.g. the OCP-Pipeline in Ecuador destroying parts of the amazon rainforest – even in protected areas – that are not recoverable.

Kurt Fischer wrote on 01-11-2005:
Exxon has a different understanding of global warmning than I do. It even helps to fund people that agree with its position. The foolish corporation even has deluded scientists on its staff that don’t agree with me. How can they be so foolish? After all, I have a degree in English and I read the New York Times. All my friends agree with me. How unthinking of them!!!

Olli Peltonen wrote on 01-11-2005:
..and we know that bush’s family owns remarkable pice of ExxonMobil.

anonymous wrote on 01-11-2005:
I quote Arnold Lane….

Steve Gerrish wrote on 01-11-2005:
I haven’t bought Esso petrol for over 20 years. The corporate culture that persuaded me to do this back then goes on and on. When will big companies realise that their business must adapt or die? The status quo does not apply in almost all walks of life. Life is change.

Arnold Lane wrote on 01-11-2005:
We all have to share and live on this planet or???? are these people living on Mars and controlling the oil industry from there?????death of the planet means death to all. Final.

Arnold Lane wrote on 01-11-2005:
We all have to share and live on this planet or???? are these people living on Mars and controlling the oil industry from there?????death of the planet means death to all. Final.


goto page: 1 2